Back Home About Us Contact Us
Town Charters
Seniors
Federal Budget
Ethics
Hall of Shame
Education
Unions
Binding Arbitration
State - Budget
Local - Budget
Prevailing Wage
Jobs
Health Care
Referendum
Eminent Domain
Group Homes
Consortium
TABOR
Editorials
Tax Talk
Press Releases
Find Representatives
Web Sites
Media
CT Taxpayer Groups
 
Education


DealBook: Grassley Questions Education Agency's Ties to Wall Street   By Ben Protess BUSINESS DAY   | July 28, 2011

Senator Charles E. Grassley is examining whether Education Department officials disclosed confidential government information to hedge fund managers, including the well-known stock picker Steve Eisman.

The inquiry stems from the agency’s recent efforts to overhaul the for-profit college industry, which has been accused of saddling students with huge piles of debt. Expecting tough new rules in the wake of the controversy, Mr. Eisman and other hedge fund traders placed huge bets against the industry. In a letter this week, Mr. Grassley questioned the education secretary, Arne Duncan, about the agency’s ties to the hedge fund world and the lack of policies restricting contact with Wall Street players.

“If it is indeed the case that Department of Education employees were on familiar terms with hedge fund short-sellers, this raises serious questions regarding the internal controls,” Mr. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, said in the letter. “My concerns center on the possibility that senior Department of Education staffers may have provided information to short-sellers during the time leading up to the public release” of new regulations.

An agency spokesman said officials never shared private information with outsiders.

“We’re very proud of the integrity of our process and feel we produced a regulation that gives students and taxpayers the protection they deserve,” the spokesman, Justin Hamilton, said in a statement. “We talked to as many people as possible when developing the regulations including several officials from publicly traded for-profit colleges.”

There is no indication that Mr. Eisman or any other hedge fund manager traded on — or received — inside information. A spokesman for Mr. Eisman, who has not been accused of wrongdoing, declined to comment.

Over the last several months, Mr. Grassley has been focused on the nexus of Washington and Wall Street. His office is looking into the Securities and Exchange Commission’s handling of a series of stock trades by the hedge fund firm SAC Capital Advisors.

The senator also scrutinized the Federal Communications Commission’s decision to grant a crucial waiver to LightSquared, the wireless telecommunications venture backed by the billionaire hedge fund manager Philip A. Falcone.

Now Mr. Grassley is joining the broader inquiry into the Education Department’s relationship with Wall Street. Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma, has called for a government investigation into potential insider leaks.

Rodney White/The Des Moines Register, via Associated PressEducation Secretary Arne Duncan in Des Moines.

The Education Department’s internal watchdog is already looking into whether certain traders influenced the for-profit college rules. Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, an independent from Connecticut, wrote to Mr. Duncan in April to request an update on the outcome of that investigation.

Mr. Eisman — the former manager at FrontPoint Partners who made a fortune betting against subprime mortgages — was one of several investors to lobby the agency about the potential regulations. In an e-mail sent to agency officials in May 2010, he pushed for tough new restrictions on the colleges, according to agency documents reviewed by The New York Times.

Last month, a report by the Project on Government Oversight, a nonprofit watchdog group, raised questions about Wall Street’s influence over the agency. The group obtained several e-mail chains between agency officials and hedge fund traders who discussed the for-profit college rules.

In April 2010, an agency official alerted a hedge fund manager based in Texas that he should submit comments on the rules soon because “the latest on the timing” of the proposal’s due date was May. A couple of weeks later, the official helped organize a conference call for the trader and some department officials.

Mr. Grassley’s letter also cited an e-mail that Mr. Eisman sent to an agency official on July 19, 2010, titled “i know you cannot respond.”

“But just fyi,” the message continued, “Education stocks are running because people are hearing D.O.E. is backing down on” the regulation. Roughly 20 minutes later, the official forwarded the e-mail to a fellow agency employee, James Kvaal, according to the letter. Mr. Kvaal promptly passed on the message to another education official with a note saying, “Let’s discuss.”

While Mr. Grassley acknowledged that government officials “cannot prevent investors such as Mr. Eisman from contacting them, it is extremely concerning” that the e-mail was “forwarded to high-level Department of Education employees within 24 minutes.”

Mr. Grassley added that “it seems surprising that Mr. Eisman was on such familiar terms” with the agency official.